Tuesday, September 17, 2019
Elizabeth Gaskell and Industrialization Essay
Two of Elizabeth Gaskellââ¬â¢s novelsââ¬âNorth and South and Mary Bartonââ¬âprovide a critical insight into the authorââ¬â¢s attempt at probing the issues surrounding industrialization in Victorian England. Apart from the fact that both novels feature female characters as protagonists, they also highlight the classic struggle between rich and poor classes in the face of an emerging industrial society. Without losing track of the flow of the storiesââ¬â¢ plots, Gaskell is able to incorporate the vital aspects of industrialization. In North and South, Elizabeth Gaskell writes about the struggles of the urban working class in industrial England, specifically in its northern regions, during the 19th century in contrast to the lifestyles of those who live in the wealthier south. Because the story is shown from the perspective of the heroine, Margaret Hale, Gaskell is able to display the other side of the stereotypes attributed to women during the 19th century. For the most part, women at that time were barely able to face their personal circumstances and address them on their own. Margaret Hale, however, defies the notion that women largely depend on men just to live. She initially resists that belief by rejecting romantic proposalsââ¬âa move that shows how she is in control of her lifeââ¬âand displays it at its highest when she throws her arms around John Thornton in an effort to protect him from the angry mob. The latter indicates that it is not always women who seek the protection of men because women can also protect men even at the expense of such women. As Patsy Stoneman indicates in her book Elizabeth Gaskell, ââ¬Å"[Margaret Hale] confronts the fact that men of all classes are governed, in the public sphere, by a masculine code,â⬠a code that effectively prevents the characteristic of tenderness attributed to females (Stoneman, p. 86). Margaretââ¬â¢s willingness to protect Thornton does not only imbibe the thought that women are tender and should not be harmed. It also presents the idea that womenââ¬âespecially those who are considered outsiders to industrial areas such as Miltonââ¬âcan also learn to sympathize with the people who are working under poverty. The incident in the story where the workers were in a strike against Thornton, the local mill owner, also underlines the idea that an outsider can relate to the woes and conditions of the workers more than those who are directly involved in the industrial system. Another interesting aspect of Gaskellââ¬â¢s thematic exploration of industrialization in North and South is how she was able to reunite, in a manner of speaking, the classes considered as polar opposites. As Dorice Williams Elliott observes in her article: ââ¬Å"the novel bases its case for womenââ¬â¢s mediation between classes on an analogy between marriage and class cooperationâ⬠(Elliott, p. 25). The presence of the outsider, Margaret, in the industrial town makes it possible for the marriage between the classes to commence. Margaret became no less than a person who paved the way for the better understanding between the rich and poor divide although her presence alone did not entirely dissolve the prevalent disparity. Elliottââ¬â¢s observation that Margaretââ¬â¢s mediation led to class cooperation simply reaffirms the idea that ââ¬Ëclass cooperationâ⬠in itself still presumes differences between social classes. In Mary Barton, the disparities between the rich and the poor classes take the shape of the story of a father who seeks to protect his daughter from becoming a fallen woman. Like Margaret Hale in North and South, the story revolves around the life and struggles of Mary Barton in Victorian England. John Barton, Maryââ¬â¢s father, is a millworker who lost most of the members of his family except Mary. One interesting part of the story is when John shot Henry Carson, the son of a rich mill owner. Being someone who deeply questions the wealth disparities between rich and poorââ¬âlargely because he was ââ¬Å"chairman at many a Tradeââ¬â¢s Union meeting; a friend of delegates,â⬠someone who was ââ¬Å"ambitious of being a delegate himselfâ⬠and a ââ¬Å"Chartistâ⬠who was ââ¬Å"ready to do anything for his orderâ⬠(Gaskell, p. 25)ââ¬âJohnââ¬â¢s murder of Henry symbolizes how the members of the poor class sometimes grow desperate. The story is ingenious in the sense that it perfectly subsumes the issues surrounding industrialization in Victorian England into the tale of a womanââ¬â¢s quest for love. Mary Barton is a classic example of how Gaskell effectively writes about the problems caused by industrialization in Victorian England without losing sight of the storyââ¬â¢s plot. Despite the debates as to whether Gaskellââ¬â¢s novels genuinely reflect the true nature of the Victorian English society during the onset of the industrial period, it should be reminded that what her novels do is to give a fictional account of the problems people face when dealing with people from another social class. Susan Morgan writes that ââ¬Å"the criterion of likelihood is an inappropriate approach to Gaskellââ¬â¢s workâ⬠(Morgan, p. 44). For example, ââ¬Å"it may have well been unlikely in Manchester for relations between worker and employer to find solutions through individual friendshipsâ⬠(Morgan, p. 44). Whatever reasons there may be as to why Gaskell wrote as she did, it is enough to note that North and South and Mary Barton capture the struggles of fictional characters in the face of industrialization. The novels may be fiction at best, yet the circumstance they suggestsââ¬âthe epic divide between rich and poorââ¬âremains as real today as it once was. Works Cited Elliott, Dorice Williams. ââ¬Å"The Female Visitor and the Marriage of Classes in Gaskellââ¬â¢s North and South. â⬠Nineteenth-Century Literature 49. 1 (1994): 21-49. Gaskell, Elizabeth Cleghorn. Mary Barton. Ed. Shirley Foster. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Morgan, Susan. ââ¬Å"Gaskellââ¬â¢s Heroines and the Power of Time. â⬠Pacific Coast Philology 18. 1/2 (1983): 43-51. Stoneman, Patsy. Elizabeth Gaskell. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.